Rowland says he'd reconsider putting campus downtown
Thursday, October 10, 2002
By RAY HACKETT
Norwich Bulletin
NORWICH -- Gov. John G. Rowland said Wednesday
that if re-elected next month to a third term, he will continue his
urban revitalization efforts, focusing on medium-size cities -- and
possibly reconsider putting Three Rivers Community College downtown if
it is cost-effective and the community supports it.
"I still want to do something downtown," he said during a meeting
with the Norwich Bulletin editorial board. "The waterfront is
spectacular. There's so many opportunities for something to happen down
there."
When asked whether he would reconsider consolidating Three Rivers
Community College in the downtown in light of neighborhood opposition on
Mahan Drive, Rowland said the decision still rests with the community
and on whether such a move is cost-effective.
A recent state study declared Mahan Drive the most suitable place for
consolidation and expansion of the college, but neighborhood opposition
to the move is getting louder. Other proposals include the Norwich
Harbor area, Chestnut Street downtown and the Norwich Hospital property
in nearby Preston.
"If everyone in town decides that (Mahan Drive) doesn't work and all
the legislators and everyone got on board, we'd just go back and
continue turning this around for another year," he said. "The board of
trustees and OPM and others have steered this thing more than I have. I
just said we want to build this darn thing and get it done. I have no
parochial interest where it goes at all."
The governor, who reiterated his willingness to help Norwich realize
its economic development potential, stopped short of committing state
support to any "new" specific college initiative, highlighting instead
the progress made in moving existing projects along, such as the
Wauregan Hotel renovations and Mercantile Exchange construction.
Curry's approach
His Democratic challenger, Bill Curry, who has characterized
Rowland's urban revitalization efforts as failures during the course of
the gubernatorial campaign, said Wednesday that he, too, was committed
to the economic revitalization of eastern Connecticut -- but with a much
different approach.
Speaking before a gathering of local business and community leaders
at a Northeastern Connecticut Chamber of Commerce breakfast earlier
Wednesday, Curry said he would completely overhaul the state's economic
development programs, relying on local officials to direct funding to
efforts that best suits the needs of the local communities.
"I'm going to give the old thing a gut rehab," he told a crowd of
about 95 at the Imperial Room in Danielson. "I want to make sure the
money goes to the community level for actual business and community
leaders to make the decisions of how we lend and invest money in those
communities."
Campaign in region
Rowland and Curry brought their respective gubernatorial campaigns to
eastern Connecticut Wednesday, spending much of the day in the region
meeting with various groups and editorial boards, covering a wide range
of issues, although not straying too far from the central themes each
has emphasized throughout the campaign.
In his speech to about 95 community and business leaders, Curry
touted his proposed $750 million property tax relief plan. Under his
proposal, the Democratic challenger said he could best aid cities and
towns by relieving the burden of funding local education borne by
overburdening property owners.
Curry said the Rowland administration's emphasis on large urban
development projects has not produced the economic development results
that were promised while cities and towns statewide continue to struggle
with local education budgets because the state is not doing its fair
share.
"We have over-relied on the property tax to fund education too long,"
he said. "You can't make smart development decisions because every town
is so hungry for the property tax revenue. This is not about band
uniforms anymore, this is about math teachers."
Rowland questioned the validity of Curry's proposal during his
meeting with the Bulletin's editorial board, saying the Curry plan could
not raise sufficient revenue to support the programs and promises he is
making.
"I guess the question the people of Norwich will have to ask
themselves is, what are my chances for economic renaissance, better
schools, more investment in my back yard -- are they better under
Rowland or under Curry?" he said. "And that's probably a fairly easy
answer."
Rowland said a more fiscally conservative approach must be taken as
the state struggles with budget shortfalls and decreasing revenues. He
said while his opponent is making campaign promises, he is being honest
by not promising to cut taxes or increase spending.
"How do you really do the property tax thing," he said. "You've got
to get a bigger tax base."
rhackett@norwich.gannett.com
|